Breath Analysis or blood test not necessary to insurer to reject the claim on ground of drunken drive : said supreme court

 Supreme court order is in the e below link

https://drive.google.com/file/d/17C795DNIXkq5FDihaItte5SmsIb_VOhe/view?usp=drivesdk

Or 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/17C795DNIXkq5FDihaItte5SmsIb_VOhe/view?usp=drivesdk

RTI ACT 2005 and Section 20 and Penalties

 Central Government  RTI Act2005  and its penalties

Section 20 in The Right To Information Act, 2005

20. Penalties.—

(1) Where the Central Information Commission or the State Information Commission, as the case may be, at the time of deciding any complaint or appeal is of the opinion that the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, has, without any reasonable cause, refused to receive an application for information or has not furnished information within the time specified under sub‑section (1) of section 7 or malafidely denied the request for information or knowingly given incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroyed information which was the subject of the request or obstructed in any manner in furnishing the information, it shall impose a penalty of two hundred and fifty rupees each day till application is received or information is furnished, so however, the total amount of such penalty shall not exceed twenty‑five thousand rupees: Provided that the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, shall be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard before any penalty is imposed on him: Provided further that the burden of proving that he acted reasonably and diligently shall be on the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer, as the case may be.

(2) Where the Central Information Commission or the State Information Commission, as the case may be, at the time of deciding any complaint or appeal is of the opinion that the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, has, without any reasonable cause and persistently, failed to receive an application for information or has not furnished information within the time specified under sub‑section (1) of section 7 or malafidely denied the request for information or knowingly given incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroyed information which was the subject of the request or obstructed in any manner in furnishing the information, it shall recommend for disciplinary action against the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, under the service rules applicable to him.

Updated version dated 12.12.2019 for Tool for the RICT SOLUTION and LOT generator

Updated version dated 12.12.2019

Click the below link to down load.

 https://drive.google.com/file/d/13J_SIF6CYj49cjg13OM1a8oOXxFDq7iL/view?usp=drivesdk

Just download it and replace the existing MsAccess dB of CSI_SDP.accdb available inside C:\SDP_CSI.

Updates:
RD default fee not appearing properly in counter transactions LOT. Rectified.